Email Us

The Difference Between OGS, In-Cell, and On-Cell Display Technologies

As touchscreen technology evolves, display manufacturers continue to pursue thinner, lighter, and more responsive designs. Three popular touch integration methods — OGS, On-Cell, and In-Cell — represent key stages in this evolution. While all aim to combine the touch layer and display module for improved performance, they differ significantly in structure, manufacturing process, and application scenarios.


Below is a detailed explanation of each technology and how they compare.


1. OGS (One Glass Solution)


Definition

OGS (One Glass Solution) is a type of touchscreen structure that integrates the touch sensor directly onto the cover glass, eliminating the separate sensor glass used in traditional G+G (Glass + Glass) touch panels.


Structure

The touch sensor (ITO layer) is coated or patterned directly on the cover glass.

Beneath it lies the LCD or TFT display panel, bonded together with optical adhesive (OCA).

So the overall stack becomes:
Cover Glass (with touch sensor) + OCA + LCD Module


Advantages

  • Thinner and lighter: Removes one layer of glass compared to G+G structures.

  • Better light transmission: Fewer layers mean higher brightness and better visibility.

  • Improved sensitivity: The touch electrode is closer to the user’s finger.

  • Simpler assembly: Reduces the number of components.


Disadvantages

  • Fragile: Since the touch sensor is on the cover glass, it’s more prone to damage if the screen breaks.

  • Difficult repairability: A damaged glass usually means replacing the entire module.

  • Limited for very large screens due to yield and manufacturing challenges.


Common Applications

OGS technology is widely used in mid-range smartphones, tablets, and industrial touch displays where cost and performance balance is important.


2. On-Cell Technology


Definition

On-Cell technology integrates the touch sensor layer directly on top of the display’s glass substrate — specifically on the upper polarizer or encapsulation glass of the LCD/TFT layer.


Structure

In On-Cell designs, the touch electrodes are deposited on the top layer of the display cell itself, just beneath the cover glass.
So the structure looks like:
Cover Glass + OCA + Touch Sensor on Display Glass + Display Panel


Advantages

  • Thinner module than OGS, as the touch sensor is already part of the display glass.

  • Better touch accuracy since the touch layer is closer to the pixels.

  • Fewer optical layers, resulting in slightly better light transmission.

  • Lower risk of air gaps, improving visual clarity and contrast.


Disadvantages

  • Complex manufacturing: Requires display and touch integration during LCD production.

  • Harder to repair: Damage to the touch sensor may require replacing the entire display.

  • Higher production cost compared to OGS.


Common Applications

On-Cell is commonly found in mid- to high-end smartphones, automotive displays, and portable devices where thinness and durability are priorities.


3. In-Cell Technology


Definition

In-Cell technology goes a step further by embedding the touch sensor circuitry inside the LCD or OLED cell structure itself, directly integrated with the TFT or pixel layer.


Structure

In this approach, the touch electrodes are built within the LCD’s cell layers — often sharing the same substrate as the pixel electrodes.

Typical structure:
Cover Glass + OCA + LCD Cell (with integrated touch function)

There is no separate touch sensor layer; the touch sensing elements are built directly into the display’s internal structure.


Advantages

  • Thinnest and lightest design: Combines touch and display into a single cell.

  • Excellent optical performance: Fewer layers mean higher transmittance and better color accuracy.

  • Enhanced responsiveness: The touch sensor is closest to the display pixels, reducing touch latency.

  • Reduced parallax effect, providing a more direct “touch-on-image” feeling.


Disadvantages

  • High manufacturing difficulty: Integration requires advanced production lines and tight precision.

  • Lower yield rates: Minor defects during production can lead to display rejection.

  • Costly to produce and repair: Typically used in high-end devices due to complexity.

  • Limited compatibility: In-cell design must be matched precisely with the display driver IC.


Common Applications

In-Cell displays are widely used in flagship smartphones, premium tablets, smartwatches, and high-end automotive displays, where performance, slimness, and visual clarity are key.


Choosing the Right Technology


OGS is ideal when seeking a cost-effective solution that offers good optical performance for mid-tier devices.

On-Cell balances thinness and performance, making it suitable for automotive and industrial applications that demand durability and clarity.

In-Cell offers the best visual and tactile experience, favored in high-end mobile devices and smart displays where performance and aesthetics matter most.


the-difference-between-ogs-in-cell-and-on-cell-display-technologies.jpg




Related Products Of LCD Display Modules
Related News Of LCD Display Modules
We use cookies to offer you a better browsing experience, analyze site traffic and personalize content. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Visit our cookie policy to learn more.
Reject Accept